The claim that personality is more important than intelligence in predicting important life outcomes has been greatly exaggerated

Chen Zisman, Yoav Ganzach

פרסום מחקרי: פרסום בכתב עתמאמרביקורת עמיתים

13 ציטוטים ‏(Scopus)

תקציר

We conduct a replication of Borghans, Golsteyn, Heckman and Humphries (PNAS, 2016) who suggested that personality is more important than intelligence in predicting important life outcomes. We focus on the prediction of educational (educational attainment, GPA) and occupational (pay) success, and analyze two of the databases that BGHH used (the NLSY79, n = 5594 and the MIDUS, n = 2240) as well as four additional databases, (the NLSY97, n = 2962, the WLS, n = 7646, the PIAAC, n = 3605 and the ADD health, n = 3553; all databases are American except of the PIAAC which is German). We found that for educational attainment the average R2 of intelligence was .232 whereas for personality it was .053. For GPA it was .229 and .024, respectively and for pay it was .080 and .040, respectively.

שפה מקוריתאנגלית
מספר המאמר101631
כתב עתIntelligence
כרך92
מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs)
סטטוס פרסוםפורסם - 1 מאי 2022
פורסם באופן חיצוניכן

טביעת אצבע

להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'The claim that personality is more important than intelligence in predicting important life outcomes has been greatly exaggerated'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.

פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי