TY - JOUR
T1 - On the roots of independence polynomials of almost all very well-covered graphs
AU - Levit, Vadim E.
AU - Mandrescu, Eugen
PY - 2008/2/15
Y1 - 2008/2/15
N2 - If sk denotes the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, and α (G) is the size of a maximum stable set, then I (G ; x) = ∑k = 0α (G) sk xk is the independence polynomial of G [I. Gutman, F. Harary, Generalizations of the matching polynomial, Utilitas Math. 24 (1983) 97-106]. A graph G is very well-covered [O. Favaron, Very well-covered graphs, Discrete Math. 42 (1982) 177-187] if it has no isolated vertices, its order equals 2 α (G) and it is well-covered, i.e., all its maximal independent sets are of the same size [M.D. Plummer, Some covering concepts in graphs, J. Combin. Theory 8 (1970) 91-98]. For instance, appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G yields a very well-covered graph, which we denote by G*. Under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some G [A. Finbow, B. Hartnell, R.J. Nowakowski, A characterization of well-covered graphs of girth 5 or greater, J. Combin. Theory Ser B 57 (1993) 44-68]. The root of the smallest modulus of the independence polynomial of any graph is real [J.I. Brown, K. Dilcher, R.J. Nowakowski, Roots of independence polynomials of well-covered graphs, J. Algebraic Combin. 11 (2000) 197-210]. The location of the roots of the independence polynomial in the complex plane, and the multiplicity of the root of the smallest modulus are investigated in a number of articles. In this paper we establish formulae connecting the coefficients of I (G ; x) and I (G* ; x), which allow us to show that the number of roots of I (G ; x) is equal to the number of roots of I (G* ; x) different from - 1, which appears as a root of multiplicity α (G*) - α (G) for I (G* ; x). We also prove that the real roots of I (G* ; x) are in [- 1,- 1 / 2 α (G*)), while for a general graph of order n we show that its roots lie in | z | > 1 / (2 n - 1). Hoede and Li [Clique polynomials and independent set polynomials of graphs, Discrete Math. 125 (1994) 219-228] posed the problem of finding graphs that can be uniquely defined by their clique polynomials (clique-unique graphs). Stevanovic [Clique polynomials of threshold graphs, Univ. Beograd Publ. Elektrotehn. Fac., Ser. Mat. 8 (1997) 84-87] proved that threshold graphs are clique-unique. Here, we demonstrate that the independence polynomial distinguishes well-covered spiders (K1, n *, n ≥ 1) among well-covered trees.
AB - If sk denotes the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, and α (G) is the size of a maximum stable set, then I (G ; x) = ∑k = 0α (G) sk xk is the independence polynomial of G [I. Gutman, F. Harary, Generalizations of the matching polynomial, Utilitas Math. 24 (1983) 97-106]. A graph G is very well-covered [O. Favaron, Very well-covered graphs, Discrete Math. 42 (1982) 177-187] if it has no isolated vertices, its order equals 2 α (G) and it is well-covered, i.e., all its maximal independent sets are of the same size [M.D. Plummer, Some covering concepts in graphs, J. Combin. Theory 8 (1970) 91-98]. For instance, appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G yields a very well-covered graph, which we denote by G*. Under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some G [A. Finbow, B. Hartnell, R.J. Nowakowski, A characterization of well-covered graphs of girth 5 or greater, J. Combin. Theory Ser B 57 (1993) 44-68]. The root of the smallest modulus of the independence polynomial of any graph is real [J.I. Brown, K. Dilcher, R.J. Nowakowski, Roots of independence polynomials of well-covered graphs, J. Algebraic Combin. 11 (2000) 197-210]. The location of the roots of the independence polynomial in the complex plane, and the multiplicity of the root of the smallest modulus are investigated in a number of articles. In this paper we establish formulae connecting the coefficients of I (G ; x) and I (G* ; x), which allow us to show that the number of roots of I (G ; x) is equal to the number of roots of I (G* ; x) different from - 1, which appears as a root of multiplicity α (G*) - α (G) for I (G* ; x). We also prove that the real roots of I (G* ; x) are in [- 1,- 1 / 2 α (G*)), while for a general graph of order n we show that its roots lie in | z | > 1 / (2 n - 1). Hoede and Li [Clique polynomials and independent set polynomials of graphs, Discrete Math. 125 (1994) 219-228] posed the problem of finding graphs that can be uniquely defined by their clique polynomials (clique-unique graphs). Stevanovic [Clique polynomials of threshold graphs, Univ. Beograd Publ. Elektrotehn. Fac., Ser. Mat. 8 (1997) 84-87] proved that threshold graphs are clique-unique. Here, we demonstrate that the independence polynomial distinguishes well-covered spiders (K1, n *, n ≥ 1) among well-covered trees.
KW - Clique-unique graph
KW - Independence polynomial
KW - Root
KW - Stable set
KW - Well-covered graph
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349085579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dam.2006.06.016
DO - 10.1016/j.dam.2006.06.016
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:38349085579
SN - 0166-218X
VL - 156
SP - 478
EP - 491
JO - Discrete Applied Mathematics
JF - Discrete Applied Mathematics
IS - 4
ER -