תקציר
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine for procedural pain in children. METHODS: Systematic review was performed (MEDLINE 1990-June 2001) of all studies comparing the efficacy of these 2 modalities of pain relief in children undergoing painful cutaneous procedures. Search terms included lidocaine, prilocaine, tetracaine, and anesthesia. RESULTS: Eight studies compared lidocaine-prilocaine with tetracaine in children for 4 different procedures: intravenous cannulation, venipuncture, Port-a-Cath puncture, and laser therapy. When used as labeled (60 min for lidocaine-prilocaine, 30 min for tetracaine), the 2 modalities provided similar analgesic efficacy. When both anesthetics were applied for a similar duration of time (40 min, 60 min, 2 h), tetracaine provided superior anesthesia. Tetracaine was commonly associated with erythema, and lidocaine-prilocaine was associated with blanching of the skin. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine-prilocaine and tetracaine appear to be comparable for procedural pain relief when used as recommended. Tetracaine is more efficacious than lidocaine-prilocaine when both anesthetics are applied for the same amount of time.
| שפה מקורית | אנגלית |
|---|---|
| עמודים (מ-עד) | 687-692 |
| מספר עמודים | 6 |
| כתב עת | Annals of Pharmacotherapy |
| כרך | 36 |
| מספר גיליון | 4 |
| מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs) | |
| סטטוס פרסום | פורסם - 2002 |
| פורסם באופן חיצוני | כן |
טביעת אצבע
להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus tetracaine gel for procedural pain in children'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver