דילוג לניווט ראשי דילוג לחיפוש דילוג לתוכן הראשי

Influence of diagnostic method on outcomes in phase 3 clinical trials of bezlotoxumab for the prevention of recurrent clostridioides difficile infection: A post Hoc analysis of MODIFY I/II

  • Mark H. Wilcox
  • , Galia Rahav
  • , Erik R. Dubberke
  • , Lori Gabryelski
  • , Kerrie Davies
  • , Claire Berry
  • , Karen Eves
  • , Misoo C. Ellison
  • , Dalya Guris
  • , Mary Beth Dorr

פרסום מחקרי: פרסום בכתב עתמאמרביקורת עמיתים

10 ציטוטים ‏(Scopus)

תקציר

Background: The optimum diagnostic test method for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains controversial due to variation in accuracy in identifying true CDI. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of CDI diagnostic testing methodology on efficacy outcomes in phase 3 MODIFY I/II trials. Methods: In MODIFY I/II (NCT01241552/NCT01513239), participants received bezlotoxumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo during anti-CDI treatment for primary/recurrent CDI (rCDI). Using MODIFY I/II pooled data, initial clinical cure (ICC) and rCDI were assessed in participants diagnosed at baseline using direct detection methods (enzyme immunoassay [EIA]/cell cytotoxicity assay [CCA]) or indirect methods to determine toxin-producing ability (toxin gene polymerase chain reaction [tgPCR]/toxigenic culture). Results: Of 1554 participants who received bezlotoxumab or placebo in MODIFY I/II, 781 (50.3%) and 773 (49.7%) were diagnosed by tgPCR/toxigenic culture and toxin EIA/CCA, respectively. Participants diagnosed by toxin EIA/CCA were more likely to be inpatients, older, and have severe CDI. In bezlotoxumab recipients, ICC rates were slightly higher in the toxin EIA/CCA subgroup (81.7%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (78.4%). Bezlotoxumab significantly reduced the rCDI rate vs placebo in both subgroups; however, the magnitude of reduction was substantially larger in participants diagnosed by toxin EIA/CCA (relative difference,-46.6%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (-29.1%). In bezlotoxumab recipients, the rCDI rate was lower in the toxin EIA/CCA subgroup (17.6%) vs tgPCR/toxigenic culture (23.6%; absolute difference,-6.0%; 95% confidence interval,-12.4 to 0.3; relative difference,-25.4%). Conclusions: Diagnostic tests that detect fecal C. difficile toxins are of fundamental importance to accurately diagnosing CDI, including in clinical trial design, ensuring that therapeutic efficacy is not underestimated.

שפה מקוריתאנגלית
מספר המאמרofz293
כתב עתOpen Forum Infectious Diseases
כרך6
מספר גיליון8
מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs)
סטטוס פרסוםפורסם - 3 יוני 2019
פורסם באופן חיצוניכן

טביעת אצבע

להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'Influence of diagnostic method on outcomes in phase 3 clinical trials of bezlotoxumab for the prevention of recurrent clostridioides difficile infection: A post Hoc analysis of MODIFY I/II'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.

פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי