תקציר
The paper examines effects of executives' orientations on crisis management awareness and practices, drawing on the simplicity and paradox management theories. It is suggested that a focus on single-sided management constitutes an antecedent of crisis proneness. Employing a set of key corporate domains and based on a holistic organizational approach, the study aims at assessing the extent to which companies are crisis prone or prepared. In a sample of 82 Istaeli business and not-for-profit organizations it was found that human resource management, strategy, structure, and unlearning factors significantly predicted crisis preparedness. These results suggest that unlearning, despite a mere allusion to this correlate in the simplicity and paradox management theories, correlates better with crisis preparedness. By contrast, traditional strategy-related and structural effects were marginally related to crisis management policies. Implications and suggestions for further research are proposed.
| שפה מקורית | אנגלית |
|---|---|
| עמודים (מ-עד) | 573-606 |
| מספר עמודים | 34 |
| כתב עת | Journal of Management Studies |
| כרך | 40 |
| מספר גיליון | 2 |
| מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs) | |
| סטטוס פרסום | פורסם - מרץ 2003 |
| פורסם באופן חיצוני | כן |
טביעת אצבע
להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'Executives' orientations as indicators of crisis management policies and practices'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver