TY - JOUR
T1 - Background matters
T2 - Minor vibratory stimulation during motor skill acquisition selectively reduces off-line memory consolidation
AU - Korman, Maria
AU - Herling, Zohar
AU - Levy, Ishay
AU - Egbarieh, Nebal
AU - Engel-Yeger, Batya
AU - Karni, Avi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Although a ubiquitous situation, it is not clear how effective is a learning experience when task-irrelevant, sensory noise occurs in the background. Here, young adults were trained on the finger opposition sequence task, in a well-established training and testing protocol affording measures for online as well as off-line learning. During the training session, one group experienced a minor background vibratory stimulation to the trunk by the means of vibrating cushion, while the second group experienced recorded sound vibrations. A control group was trained with no extra sensory stimulation. Sensory stimulation during training had no effect on the online within-session gains, but dampened the expression of the off-line, consolidation phase, gains in the two sensory stimulation groups. These results suggest that background sensory stimulation can selectively modify off-line, procedural memory consolidation processes, despite well-preserved on-line learning. Classical studies have shown that neural plasticity in sensory systems is modulated by motor input. The current results extend this notion and suggest that some types of task-irrelevant sensory stimulation, concurrent with motor training, may constitute a ‘gating’ factor - modulating the triggering of long-term procedural memory consolidation processes. Thus, vibratory stimulation may be considered as a behavioral counterpart of pharmacological interventions that do not interfere with short term neural plasticity but block long-term plasticity.
AB - Although a ubiquitous situation, it is not clear how effective is a learning experience when task-irrelevant, sensory noise occurs in the background. Here, young adults were trained on the finger opposition sequence task, in a well-established training and testing protocol affording measures for online as well as off-line learning. During the training session, one group experienced a minor background vibratory stimulation to the trunk by the means of vibrating cushion, while the second group experienced recorded sound vibrations. A control group was trained with no extra sensory stimulation. Sensory stimulation during training had no effect on the online within-session gains, but dampened the expression of the off-line, consolidation phase, gains in the two sensory stimulation groups. These results suggest that background sensory stimulation can selectively modify off-line, procedural memory consolidation processes, despite well-preserved on-line learning. Classical studies have shown that neural plasticity in sensory systems is modulated by motor input. The current results extend this notion and suggest that some types of task-irrelevant sensory stimulation, concurrent with motor training, may constitute a ‘gating’ factor - modulating the triggering of long-term procedural memory consolidation processes. Thus, vibratory stimulation may be considered as a behavioral counterpart of pharmacological interventions that do not interfere with short term neural plasticity but block long-term plasticity.
KW - Consolidation
KW - Online and offline learning
KW - Procedural memory
KW - Sensory interference
KW - Sensory stimulation
KW - Vibratory noise
KW - Whole-body vibration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012993533&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.02.002
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 28189551
AN - SCOPUS:85012993533
SN - 1074-7427
VL - 140
SP - 27
EP - 32
JO - Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
JF - Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
ER -