דילוג לניווט ראשי דילוג לחיפוש דילוג לתוכן הראשי

Are the Measurements of Attention Allocation and Perceived Exertion Trustworthy?

  • Gily Meir
  • , Jasmin C. Hutchinson
  • , Christine M. Habeeb
  • , Nataniel M. Boiangin
  • , Cory Shaffer
  • , Itay Basevitch
  • , Gershon Tenenbaum

פרסום מחקרי: פרסום בכתב עתמאמרביקורת עמיתים

9 ציטוטים ‏(Scopus)

תקציר

Two studies examined the trustworthiness of commonly used measurement scales for ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and state attentional focus (SAF) during exercise. In Study 1, participants (N = 24, 14 female) performed a treadmill graded-exercise test. The order of scale presentation during the task was manipulated (i.e., RPE followed by SAF or vice versa). In Study 2 the same order manipulation was used while participants (N = 70, 36 female) performed a stepping task for three consecutive trials. Additionally, time intervals between scale presentations were manipulated (i.e., 30 sec, 60 sec, or 90 sec) and counterbalanced between trials. Non-significant order effects of RPE and SAF emerged in both studies; however, a more frequent presentation of the two scales (30 sec and 60 sec) yielded higher RPE scores and increased associative attentional focus than a less frequent presentation (90 sec). The authors recommend minimizing measurement interruptions during the measurement process.

שפה מקוריתאנגלית
עמודים (מ-עד)167-176
מספר עמודים10
כתב עתMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
כרך19
מספר גיליון4
מזהי עצם דיגיטלי (DOIs)
סטטוס פרסוםפורסם - 2 אוק׳ 2015
פורסם באופן חיצוניכן

טביעת אצבע

להלן מוצגים תחומי המחקר של הפרסום 'Are the Measurements of Attention Allocation and Perceived Exertion Trustworthy?'. יחד הם יוצרים טביעת אצבע ייחודית.

פורמט ציטוט ביבליוגרפי