TY - GEN
T1 - WIP
T2 - 54th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2024
AU - Sopher, Hadas
AU - Hajaj, Chen
AU - Gero, John S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This work-in-progress research presents a novel approach to assessing tutor-student interactions in design studio critiques, thereby advancing studio assessment methodologies. Following constructivist theories, students learn by practicing professional design behaviors. They introduce new concepts and progress according to the tutor's feedback and demonstration. Despite their principal role, critique interactions are often tutor-centric and ambiguous, resulting in negative sentiments that may hinder participation. Current methods measure solely learners' performance of design practices while neglecting the cognitive actions involved, such as the learner's sentiment. This gap limits assessing the effectiveness of the interaction. In this study, we measure the effect of sentiment on introducing new design concepts, identified as first occurrences (FOs). We demonstrate the approach in two natural case studies comprising six critiques of three CS students and three Architecture students. NLP algorithms are developed to quantify the distribution of FOs generated by students and tutors within positive and negative sentiment environments. Changes in the sentiment throughout critiques measure the temporal role of sentiment in generating FOs. Observations exhibit differences in sentiment between CS and Architecture students. In both courses, more learner-centric FOs occurred in a positive sentiment environment. Using explicit assessment methods opens new possibilities for establishing real-time feedback systems, leading studio-based education to its next step in reshaping constructivist pedagogy.
AB - This work-in-progress research presents a novel approach to assessing tutor-student interactions in design studio critiques, thereby advancing studio assessment methodologies. Following constructivist theories, students learn by practicing professional design behaviors. They introduce new concepts and progress according to the tutor's feedback and demonstration. Despite their principal role, critique interactions are often tutor-centric and ambiguous, resulting in negative sentiments that may hinder participation. Current methods measure solely learners' performance of design practices while neglecting the cognitive actions involved, such as the learner's sentiment. This gap limits assessing the effectiveness of the interaction. In this study, we measure the effect of sentiment on introducing new design concepts, identified as first occurrences (FOs). We demonstrate the approach in two natural case studies comprising six critiques of three CS students and three Architecture students. NLP algorithms are developed to quantify the distribution of FOs generated by students and tutors within positive and negative sentiment environments. Changes in the sentiment throughout critiques measure the temporal role of sentiment in generating FOs. Observations exhibit differences in sentiment between CS and Architecture students. In both courses, more learner-centric FOs occurred in a positive sentiment environment. Using explicit assessment methods opens new possibilities for establishing real-time feedback systems, leading studio-based education to its next step in reshaping constructivist pedagogy.
KW - Sentiment analysis
KW - Student assessment
KW - Studio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000740576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893114
DO - 10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893114
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:105000740576
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
BT - 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2024 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 13 October 2024 through 16 October 2024
ER -