Winning a battle but losing the war: On the drawbacks of using the anchoring tactic in distributive negotiations

Yossi Maaravi, Asya Pazy, Yoav Ganzach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

In two experiments, we explored the possible drawbacks of applying the anchoring tactic in a negotiation context. In Study 1, buyers who used the anchoring tactic made higher profits, but their counterparts thought their own results were worse than expected and thus were less willing to engage in future negotiations with them. Study 2 showed that using the anchoring tactic in a market decreased accumulated profits by increasing the rate of impasses and prolonging the negotiations. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)548-557
Number of pages10
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume9
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anchoring
  • Bargaining
  • First offers
  • Negotiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Winning a battle but losing the war: On the drawbacks of using the anchoring tactic in distributive negotiations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this