TY - JOUR
T1 - Virtual nutrition consultation
T2 - What can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?
AU - Kaufman-Shriqui, Vered
AU - Sherf-Dagan, Shiri
AU - Boaz, Mona
AU - Birk, Ruth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Authors 2020.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Objective: To investigate the extent, quality and challenges of dietetic counselling during the pandemic. Design: A cross-sectional online thirty-six-item Google Survey. The survey queried demographics and information on usage and perceived telemedicine quality. Setting: The survey was distributed to Israeli Dietetic Association (ATID) mailing list between 31 March and 5 May 2020. Participants: Clinical dietitians, members of ATID, who consented to participated in the survey. Results: Three hundred dietitians (12 % of ATID members; 95 % women; mean age 4.41 (sd 10.2) years) replied to the survey. Most dietitians reported a significant ∼30 % decrease in work hours due to the pandemic. The most prevalent form of alternative nutrition counselling (ANC) was over the phone (72 %); 53.5 % used online platforms. Nearly 45 % had no former ANC experience. Both ANC formats were reported inferior to face-to-face nutritional consultation (consultation quality median scores 8 and 7, on a 1-10 scale, for online and phone, respectively). ANC difficulties on either phone or online platforms were technical (56 and 47 %, respectively), lack of anthropometric measurements (28 and 25 %, respectively) and interpersonal communication (19 and 14.6 %, respectively). Older age and former phone counselling experience were associated with higher quality scores, respectively (OR = 1.046, 95 % CI 1.01, 1.08, P = 0.005), (95 % CI 1.38, 4.52, P = 0.02). Those who continued to work full time had five-time greater odds for a higher quality score using online platforms (OR = 5.33, 95 % CI 1.091, 14.89, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest telemedicine holds considerable promise for dietary consultation; however, additional tools and training are needed to optimise remote ANC, especially in light of potential crisis-induced lockdown.
AB - Objective: To investigate the extent, quality and challenges of dietetic counselling during the pandemic. Design: A cross-sectional online thirty-six-item Google Survey. The survey queried demographics and information on usage and perceived telemedicine quality. Setting: The survey was distributed to Israeli Dietetic Association (ATID) mailing list between 31 March and 5 May 2020. Participants: Clinical dietitians, members of ATID, who consented to participated in the survey. Results: Three hundred dietitians (12 % of ATID members; 95 % women; mean age 4.41 (sd 10.2) years) replied to the survey. Most dietitians reported a significant ∼30 % decrease in work hours due to the pandemic. The most prevalent form of alternative nutrition counselling (ANC) was over the phone (72 %); 53.5 % used online platforms. Nearly 45 % had no former ANC experience. Both ANC formats were reported inferior to face-to-face nutritional consultation (consultation quality median scores 8 and 7, on a 1-10 scale, for online and phone, respectively). ANC difficulties on either phone or online platforms were technical (56 and 47 %, respectively), lack of anthropometric measurements (28 and 25 %, respectively) and interpersonal communication (19 and 14.6 %, respectively). Older age and former phone counselling experience were associated with higher quality scores, respectively (OR = 1.046, 95 % CI 1.01, 1.08, P = 0.005), (95 % CI 1.38, 4.52, P = 0.02). Those who continued to work full time had five-time greater odds for a higher quality score using online platforms (OR = 5.33, 95 % CI 1.091, 14.89, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest telemedicine holds considerable promise for dietary consultation; however, additional tools and training are needed to optimise remote ANC, especially in light of potential crisis-induced lockdown.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Coronavirus
KW - Dietitians
KW - Nutrition
KW - Nutrition survey
KW - Telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099532892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1368980021000148
DO - 10.1017/S1368980021000148
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33436134
AN - SCOPUS:85099532892
SN - 1368-9800
VL - 24
SP - 1166
EP - 1173
JO - Public Health Nutrition
JF - Public Health Nutrition
IS - 5
ER -