Uropathogens of various childhood populations and their antibiotic susceptibility

Shai Ashkenazi, Smadar Even-Tov, Zmira Samra, Gabriel Dinari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

To define the uropathogens of various childhood populations and their antibiotic susceptibility, 646 episodes of urinary tract infections (UTI) were studied. Of the community-acquired UTI 78% were caused by Escherichia coli and 12% by Klebsiella whereas only 65% of hospital-acquired UTI were caused by E. coli (P < 0.01), and other pathogens, including Pseudomonas, were more common. In children with UTI who did not have an underlying disorder, most infections were caused by E. coli and Klebsiella species. Children with urinary malformations or urinary catheters or those who developed UTI while receiving antibiotic prophylaxis had fewer E. coli infections and more infections caused by other pathogens, including Pseudomonas (P < 0.01). Children receiving antibiotic prophylaxis had also significantly more Enter-ococcus and Acinetobacter infections (P < 0.001), and children with urinary catheters had more Enterobacter infections (P < 0.05). Isolates of these risk groups showed increased resistance to antibiotics. Only 30–53% were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which is usually recommended for UTI; 19 to 25% and 27 to 66% were susceptible to ampicillin and cephalothin, respectively. In contrast uropathogens of immunocompromised children did not differ significantly from those of children with no underlying disturbances, nor did they show distinct antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-745
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1991
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antibiotic resistance
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Uropathogens

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uropathogens of various childhood populations and their antibiotic susceptibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this