TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes mellitus in real-life settings
T2 - the AWeSoMe Study Group experience
AU - Rachmiel, M.
AU - Landau, Z.
AU - Boaz, M.
AU - Mazor Aronovitch, K.
AU - Loewenthal, N.
AU - Ben-Ami, M.
AU - Levy-Shraga, Y.
AU - Modan-Moses, D.
AU - Haim, A.
AU - Abiri, S.
AU - Pinhas-Hamiel, O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Springer-Verlag Italia.
PY - 2015/9/16
Y1 - 2015/9/16
N2 - Aims: The aim of the study was (a) to compare annual glycemic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who used a healthcare-funded continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGMS) to that of those who performed self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) only, in a real-life setting, and (b) to define parameters associated with compliance and glycemic control. Methods: A total of 149 youth with T1DM (52.3 % females), mean age 11.8 ± 3.6 years, and 83 in the CGMS group were followed prospectively for 12 months. Glycemic control parameters and compliance to RT-CGMS were assessed periodically. Results: Glycemic parameters did not differ significantly between the groups during follow-up periods. The time spent with RT-CGMS decreased and only 38 % used it for more than 75 % of the time during the 12 months (consistent users). Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.27 % in consistent users and increased by 0.21 % among intermittent users (used RT-CGMS less than 75 % of time), p = 0.013. Consistent users were younger 10. 6 ± 4.2 vs. 12.5 ± 3.6, p = 0.07, and had higher frequency of SMBG at baseline, 10.6 ± 4.9 vs. 6.3 ± 2.8, p = 0.011. Conclusions: The adoption of RT-CGMS was low, even in a healthcare system that funds its use. Caregivers should consider patient characteristics when recommending RT-CGMS use.
AB - Aims: The aim of the study was (a) to compare annual glycemic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who used a healthcare-funded continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGMS) to that of those who performed self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) only, in a real-life setting, and (b) to define parameters associated with compliance and glycemic control. Methods: A total of 149 youth with T1DM (52.3 % females), mean age 11.8 ± 3.6 years, and 83 in the CGMS group were followed prospectively for 12 months. Glycemic control parameters and compliance to RT-CGMS were assessed periodically. Results: Glycemic parameters did not differ significantly between the groups during follow-up periods. The time spent with RT-CGMS decreased and only 38 % used it for more than 75 % of the time during the 12 months (consistent users). Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.27 % in consistent users and increased by 0.21 % among intermittent users (used RT-CGMS less than 75 % of time), p = 0.013. Consistent users were younger 10. 6 ± 4.2 vs. 12.5 ± 3.6, p = 0.07, and had higher frequency of SMBG at baseline, 10.6 ± 4.9 vs. 6.3 ± 2.8, p = 0.011. Conclusions: The adoption of RT-CGMS was low, even in a healthcare system that funds its use. Caregivers should consider patient characteristics when recommending RT-CGMS use.
KW - Children
KW - Compliance
KW - Continuous glucose monitoring
KW - Glycemic control
KW - HbA1c
KW - Sensor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925588374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00592-014-0643-6
DO - 10.1007/s00592-014-0643-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25223531
AN - SCOPUS:84925588374
SN - 0940-5429
VL - 52
SP - 323
EP - 329
JO - Acta Diabetologica
JF - Acta Diabetologica
IS - 2
ER -