Abstract
Online academic profiles are used by scholars to reflect a desired image to their online audience. In Google Scholar, scholars can select a subset of co-authors for presentation in a central location on their profile using a social feature called the “co-authroship panel”. In this work, we examine whether scientometrics and reciprocality can explain the observed selections. To this end, we scrape and thoroughly analyze a novel set of 120,000 Google Scholar profiles, ranging across four dieffectsciplines and various academic institutions. Our results seem to suggest that scholars tend to favor co-authors with higher scientometrics over others for inclusion in their co-authorship panels. Interestingly, as one’s own scientometrics are higher, the tendency to include co-authors with high scientometrics is diminishing. Furthermore, we find that reciprocality is central in explaining scholars’ selections.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3303-3313 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Scientometrics |
Volume | 129 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2024 |
Keywords
- Google Scholar
- Information science
- Online profiles
- Scientometrics
- Self-presentation