Abstract
The traditional approach in epidemiology of relating exposure to an environmental agent such as a drug or infective agent has been to measure an overall risk (i.e., average and then 'adjust risk for demographic variables and other confounders'). An attempt is sometimes made to define a 'susceptible' subgroup. The analyses are usually based on good statistical methodology rather than an understanding of the interaction of body of host and agent. A twofold risk for 1000 exposed versus nonexposed people could be an average twofold risk for all 1000 exposed or a 20-fold risk for 100 exposed individuals (i.e., a drug-host interaction). Clearly, finding the 100 individuals with a 20-fold risk has much greater clinical importance than a twofold risk for 1000 people. The world of epidemiology may be changing - we may soon be able to define risk based on genetic susceptibility, at least sometimes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 633-638 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - 1997 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Carcinogens
- Diabetes mellitus
- Drugs
- Genetics
- Molecular epidemiology
- Susceptibility