TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Hearing Aids on Sound Localization in Mild Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss
AU - Zavdy, Ofir
AU - Fostick, Leah
AU - Fink, Nir
AU - Danin, Shir
AU - Levin, Aviya
AU - Lipschitz, Noga
AU - Hilly, Ohad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/5/20
Y1 - 2024/5/20
N2 - Background Binaural hearing is of utmost importance for communicating in noisy surroundings and localizing the direction of sound. Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) affects the quality of life in both childhood and adulthood, speech development, and academic achievements. Sound amplification using air-conducting hearing aids (HAs) is a common option for hearing rehabilitation of UHL. The processing time of digital HAs can significantly delay the acoustic stimulation in 3 to 10 milliseconds, which is far longer than the maximal natural interaural time difference (ITD) of 750 microseconds. This can further impair spatial localization in these patients. Purpose We sought to assess whether HA effects on ITD and interaural level difference (ILD) impair localization among subjects with unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL). Research Design Normal-hearing participants underwent localization testing in different free field settings. Study Sample Ten volunteers with normal-hearing thresholds participated. Intervention Repeated assessments were compared between normal (binaural) hearing, UCHL induced by insertion of an inactivated HA to the ear canal (conductive HL), and amplification with a HA. Results In UCHL mode, with HA switched-off, localization was significantly impaired compared to normal hearing (NH; η 2 = 0.151). Localization error was more pronounced when sound was presented from the front and from the side of the occluded ear. When switched-on, amplification with HAs significantly improved localization for all participants compared to UCHL. Better localization with HAs was seen in high frequencies compared to low frequencies (η 2 = 0.08, 0.03). Even with HAs, localization did not reach that of NH (η 2 = 0.034). Conclusion Mild UCHL caused localization to deteriorate. HAs significantly improved sound localization, albeit the delay caused by the device processing time. Most of the improvements were seen in high-frequency sounds, representing a beneficial effect of amplification on ILD. Our results have potential clinical value in situations of mild CHL, for instance, otitis media with effusion.
AB - Background Binaural hearing is of utmost importance for communicating in noisy surroundings and localizing the direction of sound. Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) affects the quality of life in both childhood and adulthood, speech development, and academic achievements. Sound amplification using air-conducting hearing aids (HAs) is a common option for hearing rehabilitation of UHL. The processing time of digital HAs can significantly delay the acoustic stimulation in 3 to 10 milliseconds, which is far longer than the maximal natural interaural time difference (ITD) of 750 microseconds. This can further impair spatial localization in these patients. Purpose We sought to assess whether HA effects on ITD and interaural level difference (ILD) impair localization among subjects with unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL). Research Design Normal-hearing participants underwent localization testing in different free field settings. Study Sample Ten volunteers with normal-hearing thresholds participated. Intervention Repeated assessments were compared between normal (binaural) hearing, UCHL induced by insertion of an inactivated HA to the ear canal (conductive HL), and amplification with a HA. Results In UCHL mode, with HA switched-off, localization was significantly impaired compared to normal hearing (NH; η 2 = 0.151). Localization error was more pronounced when sound was presented from the front and from the side of the occluded ear. When switched-on, amplification with HAs significantly improved localization for all participants compared to UCHL. Better localization with HAs was seen in high frequencies compared to low frequencies (η 2 = 0.08, 0.03). Even with HAs, localization did not reach that of NH (η 2 = 0.034). Conclusion Mild UCHL caused localization to deteriorate. HAs significantly improved sound localization, albeit the delay caused by the device processing time. Most of the improvements were seen in high-frequency sounds, representing a beneficial effect of amplification on ILD. Our results have potential clinical value in situations of mild CHL, for instance, otitis media with effusion.
KW - Unilateral hearing loss
KW - amplification
KW - hearing aids
KW - localization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134584760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/a-1889-6578
DO - 10.1055/a-1889-6578
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 35777670
AN - SCOPUS:85134584760
SN - 1050-0545
VL - 33
SP - 357
EP - 363
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
IS - 6
ER -