The effect of detection approaches on the reported incidence of tenfold errors

Eran Kozer, Dennis Scolnik, Anna D. Jarvis, Gideon Koren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Tenfold errors in calculation of paediatric drug doses are often life threatening. The magnitude and characteristics of this phenomenon have not been fully described. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and nature of paediatric tenfold errors and to describe the effect of different detection approaches on the detection of such errors. Methods: To evaluate the incidence of tenfold errors, data were collected from three different studies on medication errors all conducted at a large tertiary care paediatric hospital: (i) a study investigating medication event reports to the hospital's Medication Incident Committee; (ii) a study auditing the charts of 1532 patients in the emergency department (ED) and; (iii) a prospective study of medication errors occurring during mock code resuscitations in the ED. Results: In the first study, 20 tenfold errors were reported during the surveyed period. Almost all errors were prescribing errors. The calculated incidence was 1 per 22 500 doses prescribed. In chart auditing study in the ED, two tenfold errors where found in 1678 orders. In the prospective study, four tenfold errors were identified in eight mock resuscitations (125 orders for drugs). Conclusion: The incidence of tenfold errors in paediatrics varies dramatically when different detection approaches are used. The rate of tenfold errors may be especially high in resuscitation situations and is underestimated by spontaneous reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-174
Number of pages6
JournalDrug Safety
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of detection approaches on the reported incidence of tenfold errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this