TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of a chemical protective ensemble on intravenous line insertion by emergency medical technicians
AU - Berkenstadt, Haim
AU - Arad, Michael
AU - Nahtomi, Orit
AU - Atsmon, Jacob
PY - 1999/10
Y1 - 1999/10
N2 - Protective gear is mandatory for medical personnel treating casualties in a contaminated environment. In the present study, we assessed the ability of emergency medical technicians to insert an intravenous line in this situation. Sixty emergency medical technicians were randomized to a control group, wearing fatigues, and a study group, wearing full protective gear. The ability to insert an intravenous line in healthy volunteers was assessed 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours after randomization. We found no effect of protective gear (p = 0.543) or time in protective gear (p = 0.8869) on success rate or on time needed for successful task completion (p = 0.4005 and p = 0.9021, respectively). The overall success rate was 58.6%, 65% in the unprotected state and 56% in the protected state, and the time was 303 ± 115 and 351 ± 113 seconds, respectively. These findings suggest that introduction of an intravenous line is possible but time consuming even after a prolonged stay in full protective gear. Alternative methods for antidotal treatment, such as the use of automatic autoinjectors for intramuscular administration, might be suggested.
AB - Protective gear is mandatory for medical personnel treating casualties in a contaminated environment. In the present study, we assessed the ability of emergency medical technicians to insert an intravenous line in this situation. Sixty emergency medical technicians were randomized to a control group, wearing fatigues, and a study group, wearing full protective gear. The ability to insert an intravenous line in healthy volunteers was assessed 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours after randomization. We found no effect of protective gear (p = 0.543) or time in protective gear (p = 0.8869) on success rate or on time needed for successful task completion (p = 0.4005 and p = 0.9021, respectively). The overall success rate was 58.6%, 65% in the unprotected state and 56% in the protected state, and the time was 303 ± 115 and 351 ± 113 seconds, respectively. These findings suggest that introduction of an intravenous line is possible but time consuming even after a prolonged stay in full protective gear. Alternative methods for antidotal treatment, such as the use of automatic autoinjectors for intramuscular administration, might be suggested.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032884808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/milmed/164.10.737
DO - 10.1093/milmed/164.10.737
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 10544630
AN - SCOPUS:0032884808
SN - 0026-4075
VL - 164
SP - 737
EP - 739
JO - Military Medicine
JF - Military Medicine
IS - 10
ER -