Abstract
A comparison is made between the widely held model that surface states (as described by Deal, et al.) are states that lie at the Si-Si02 interface (e.g., dangling bonds) and a model based on deep levels (heavy metals) in the semiconductor. It is shown that calculations based on the two models measure the same quantity but that a model based on dangling bonds is inconsistent with an observed dependence on oxide thickness. Deep-level impurities introduced during or after oxide growth, however, are expected to show a dependence on oxide thickness. Furthermore, the onset of the surface states is in agreement with that known for copper at 0.52 eV as measured from the valence band edge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 17-22 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1985 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Deal Fast-Surface States Are probably Deep-Level Impurities in the Semiconductor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver