Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The construction of victimhood nationalism as insidious trauma in prolonged conflicts: ideological and institutional transformations of the Israeli Arab leadership following October 2000

  • Nadav Gabay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since the October 2000 uprisings, Israel’s Arab citizens evolved from a marginal group to an assertive national minority at the forefront of the Palestinian National Movement in challenging the Jewish State. This transformation is explained through two interrelated arguments. First, the political engine behind it was the adoption of victimhood nationalism, a narrative predicated on the idea of the Nakba as collective/cultural ‘insidious trauma’. This narrative, identified until mid-1990s with a small nationalist faction of the Arab sector, became the dominant ideology of the Arab sector’s leadership. Second, the October 2000 events and the way in which they were investigated by the Or Commission played a central role in the success of the nationalist faction to dominate the political discourse of Arabs in Israel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-121
Number of pages23
JournalIsrael affairs
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Israeli Arab
  • Nakba
  • Or Commission
  • Oslo Accords
  • Second Intifada
  • Victimhood nationalism
  • ethnonational conflicts
  • insidious trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The construction of victimhood nationalism as insidious trauma in prolonged conflicts: ideological and institutional transformations of the Israeli Arab leadership following October 2000'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this