TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of visually-assessed quality of movement during jump-landing with ankle dorsiflexion range-of-motion and hip abductor muscle strength among healthy female athletes
AU - Rabin, Alon
AU - Einstein, Ofira
AU - Kozol, Zvi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Objective: To explore the association between ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM), and hip abductor muscle strength, to visually-assessed quality of movement during jump-landing. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Gymnasium of participating teams. Participants: 37 female volleyball players. Main outcome measures: Quality of movement in the frontal-plane, sagittal-plane, and overall (both planes) was visually rated as “good/moderate” or “poor”. Weight-bearing Ankle DF ROM and hip abductor muscle strength were compared between participants with differing quality of movement. Results: Weight-bearing DF ROM on both sides was decreased among participants with “poor” sagittal-plane quality of movement (dominant side: 50.8° versus 43.6°, P =.02; non-dominant side: 54.6° versus 45.9°, P =.01), as well as among participants with an overall “poor” quality of movement (dominant side: 51.8° versus 44.0°, P <.01; non-dominant side: 56.5° versus 45.1°, P <.01). Weight-bearing ankle DF on the non-dominant side was decreased among participants with a “poor” frontal-plane quality of movement (53.9° versus 46.0°, P =.02). No differences in hip abductor muscle strength were noted between participants with differing quality of movement. Conclusions: Visual assessment of jump-landing can detect differences in quality of movement that are associated with ankle DF ROM. Clinicians observing a poor quality of movement may wish to assess ankle DF ROM.
AB - Objective: To explore the association between ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM), and hip abductor muscle strength, to visually-assessed quality of movement during jump-landing. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Gymnasium of participating teams. Participants: 37 female volleyball players. Main outcome measures: Quality of movement in the frontal-plane, sagittal-plane, and overall (both planes) was visually rated as “good/moderate” or “poor”. Weight-bearing Ankle DF ROM and hip abductor muscle strength were compared between participants with differing quality of movement. Results: Weight-bearing DF ROM on both sides was decreased among participants with “poor” sagittal-plane quality of movement (dominant side: 50.8° versus 43.6°, P =.02; non-dominant side: 54.6° versus 45.9°, P =.01), as well as among participants with an overall “poor” quality of movement (dominant side: 51.8° versus 44.0°, P <.01; non-dominant side: 56.5° versus 45.1°, P <.01). Weight-bearing ankle DF on the non-dominant side was decreased among participants with a “poor” frontal-plane quality of movement (53.9° versus 46.0°, P =.02). No differences in hip abductor muscle strength were noted between participants with differing quality of movement. Conclusions: Visual assessment of jump-landing can detect differences in quality of movement that are associated with ankle DF ROM. Clinicians observing a poor quality of movement may wish to assess ankle DF ROM.
KW - Dorsiflexion
KW - Knee
KW - Movement pattern
KW - Visual assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042928844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.01.004
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29525640
AN - SCOPUS:85042928844
SN - 1466-853X
VL - 31
SP - 35
EP - 41
JO - Physical Therapy in Sport
JF - Physical Therapy in Sport
ER -