Subjective traumatic outlook as a screening tool for psychological trauma: Cut-off values and diagnostic criteria

Michal Mahat-Shamir, Osnat Lavenda, Yuval Palgi, Yaira Hamama-Raz, Lee Greenblatt-Kimron, Shani Pitcho-Prelorentzos, Lia Ring, Eti Bar-Shua, Menachem Ben-Ezra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Subjective Traumatic Outlook (STO) deals with changes in individuals’ perception, following a traumatic event and the difficulties of integrating pre-trauma past memories, inner traumatic memories, and current daily life. Although this short scale has excellent psychometric properties its cut-off scores for potential clinical use have yet to be established. In addition, due to the discrepancy between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in the meaurement of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the present study aimed at revalidating the STO and establishing cut-off scores for potential clinical use, based on both approaches to measure PTSD and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). Three hundred forty-three adults who were recruited through social media apps filled in self-report online questionnaires dealing with subjective perception of psychological trauma, PTSD and CPTSD. Results revalidate the STO as a screening tool for PTSD and CPTSD. We recommend a STO cut-off score of 13 and above when using the ICD-11 PTSD proposed algorithm along the PCL-5 cutoff score and a STO cut-off score of 15 when using the ICD-11 CPTSD proposed algorithm. In light of the present findings, the integration of DSM and ICD approaches is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-126
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume273
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019

Keywords

  • CPTSD
  • DSM
  • ICD
  • PTSD
  • STO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective traumatic outlook as a screening tool for psychological trauma: Cut-off values and diagnostic criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this