TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategic impact
T2 - Technical fouls and momentum shifts in basketball games – unveiling insights across quarters of two decades of NBA data
AU - Lev, Assaf
AU - Maymon, Yaniv Kanat
AU - Zion, Tomer Ben
AU - Tenenbaum, Gershon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Spanning two decades (2000–2021), this study examines the frequency and timing of technical fouls (TFs) committed by NBA coaches, and their relationship with momentum shifts throughout the quarters of a basketball game. A big data of 4,196TFs calls of NBA coaches was used to elucidate TFs association with momentum shifts, considering location, scoring position, and quarter. Logistic regression revealed higher momentum shift and win probabilities when TFs were called while the team was ahead (70% vs. 22%) and in home games (44% vs. 22%). At home, TFs calls during trailing position decreased win chances from 41% (Q1) to 10% (Q4), but when committed in a winning position, the win chances increased from 62% (Q1) to 84% (Q4). Lower TFs effects were observed in away games. Specifically, TFs during trailing position reduced win chances from 33% (Q1) to 6% (Q4), while in advantage TFs increased win chances from 44% (Q1) to 79% (Q4). The differences evident in momentum shifts due to environmental and specific situational factors are attributed to changes in the interaction among the team's motivational climate, collective efficacy, and the spectators’ drive.
AB - Spanning two decades (2000–2021), this study examines the frequency and timing of technical fouls (TFs) committed by NBA coaches, and their relationship with momentum shifts throughout the quarters of a basketball game. A big data of 4,196TFs calls of NBA coaches was used to elucidate TFs association with momentum shifts, considering location, scoring position, and quarter. Logistic regression revealed higher momentum shift and win probabilities when TFs were called while the team was ahead (70% vs. 22%) and in home games (44% vs. 22%). At home, TFs calls during trailing position decreased win chances from 41% (Q1) to 10% (Q4), but when committed in a winning position, the win chances increased from 62% (Q1) to 84% (Q4). Lower TFs effects were observed in away games. Specifically, TFs during trailing position reduced win chances from 33% (Q1) to 6% (Q4), while in advantage TFs increased win chances from 44% (Q1) to 79% (Q4). The differences evident in momentum shifts due to environmental and specific situational factors are attributed to changes in the interaction among the team's motivational climate, collective efficacy, and the spectators’ drive.
KW - Coach decision-making
KW - collective efficacy
KW - game location
KW - motivational climate
KW - spectators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002974641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17479541251333926
DO - 10.1177/17479541251333926
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105002974641
SN - 1747-9541
JO - International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching
JF - International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching
ER -