TY - JOUR
T1 - Shared mental models and intra-team psychophysiological patterns
T2 - a test of the juggling paradigm
AU - Filho, Edson
AU - Pierini, Davide
AU - Robazza, Claudio
AU - Tenenbaum, Gershon
AU - Bertollo, Maurizio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/1/17
Y1 - 2017/1/17
N2 - We explored implicit coordination mechanisms underlying the conceptual notion of “shared mental models” (SMM) through physiological (i.e., breathing and heart rates) and affective-cognitive (i.e., arousal, pleasantness, attention, self-efficacy, other’s efficacy) monitoring of two professional jugglers performing a real-time interactive task of increasing difficulty. There were two experimental conditions: “individual” (i.e., solo task) and “interactive” (i.e., two jugglers established a cooperative interaction by juggling sets of balls with each other). In both conditions, there were two task difficulties: “easy” and “hard.” Descriptive analyses revealed that engaging in a dyadic cooperative motor task (interactive condition) required greater physiological effort (Median Cohen’s d = 2.13) than performing a solo motor task (individual condition) of similar difficulty. Our results indicated a strong positive correlation between the jugglers’ heart rate for the easy (r =.87) and hard tasks (r =.77). The relationship between the jugglers’ breathing rate was significant for the easy task (r =.73) but non-significant for the hard task. The findings are interpreted based on research on SMM and Theory of Mind. Practitioners should advance the notion of “shared-regulation” in the context of team coordination through the use of biofeedback training.
AB - We explored implicit coordination mechanisms underlying the conceptual notion of “shared mental models” (SMM) through physiological (i.e., breathing and heart rates) and affective-cognitive (i.e., arousal, pleasantness, attention, self-efficacy, other’s efficacy) monitoring of two professional jugglers performing a real-time interactive task of increasing difficulty. There were two experimental conditions: “individual” (i.e., solo task) and “interactive” (i.e., two jugglers established a cooperative interaction by juggling sets of balls with each other). In both conditions, there were two task difficulties: “easy” and “hard.” Descriptive analyses revealed that engaging in a dyadic cooperative motor task (interactive condition) required greater physiological effort (Median Cohen’s d = 2.13) than performing a solo motor task (individual condition) of similar difficulty. Our results indicated a strong positive correlation between the jugglers’ heart rate for the easy (r =.87) and hard tasks (r =.77). The relationship between the jugglers’ breathing rate was significant for the easy task (r =.73) but non-significant for the hard task. The findings are interpreted based on research on SMM and Theory of Mind. Practitioners should advance the notion of “shared-regulation” in the context of team coordination through the use of biofeedback training.
KW - Shared mental models
KW - group dynamics
KW - juggling
KW - psychophysiology
KW - team coordination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961217516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1158413
DO - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1158413
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 26967590
AN - SCOPUS:84961217516
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 35
SP - 112
EP - 123
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 2
ER -