Recall bias of the symptoms of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy

Gideon Koren, Caroline Maltepe, Yvette Navioz, Jacob Wolpin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy is the most common medical condition in pregnancy. Relatively little research has been conducted on this condition, and much of it is based on women's reports. Determinants that affect women's reports of their nausea and vomiting of pregnancy symptoms have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of recall by women of their symptoms of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Study design: Two hundred women who called the Motherisk nausea and vomiting of pregnancy counseling line in Toronto were asked about the severity of their nausea and vomiting of pregnancy symptoms with the use of the pregnancy unique quantification of emesis and nausea system (PUQE). The patients were asked the same questions again during a follow-up call, which took place up to 16 weeks later. Results: There was a recall (or reporting) bias for nausea and vomiting, with women reporting significantly more severe symptoms during their follow-up call than they had reported originally. Multivariate analysis revealed that the severity of the symptoms affected the accuracy of recall positively, whereas the time that has elapsed affected it negatively. Conclusion: Retrospective evaluation of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy symptoms may produce a recall bias, which may distort the evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of antiemetics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-488
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume190
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antiemetics
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recall bias of the symptoms of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this