TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation and Dose-densification of R-CHOP in Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma With Intermediate Prognosis
T2 - The UNFOLDER Study
AU - German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA)
AU - Thurner, Lorenz
AU - Ziepert, Marita
AU - Berdel, Christian
AU - Schmidt, Christian
AU - Borchmann, Peter
AU - Kaddu-Mulindwa, Dominic
AU - Viardot, Andreas
AU - Witzens-Harig, Mathias
AU - Dierlamm, Judith
AU - Haenel, Mathias
AU - Metzner, Bernd
AU - Wulf, Gerald
AU - Lengfelder, Eva
AU - Keller, Ulrich B.
AU - Frickhofen, Norbert
AU - Nickelsen, Maike
AU - Gaska, Tobias
AU - Griesinger, Frank
AU - Mahlberg, Rolf
AU - Marks, Reinhard
AU - Shpilberg, Ofer
AU - Lindemann, Hans Walter
AU - Soekler, Martin
AU - von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer
AU - Kiehl, Michael
AU - Roemer, Eva
AU - Bentz, Martin
AU - Krammer-Steiner, Beate
AU - Trappe, Ralf
AU - de Nully Brown, Peter
AU - Federico, Massimo
AU - Merli, Francesco
AU - Engelhard, Marianne
AU - Glass, Bertram
AU - Schmitz, Norbert
AU - Truemper, Lorenz
AU - Bewarder, Moritz
AU - Hartmann, Frank
AU - Murawski, Niels
AU - Stilgenbauer, Stephan
AU - Rosenwald, Andreas
AU - Altmann, Bettina
AU - Schmidberger, Heinz
AU - Fleckenstein, Jochen
AU - Loeffler, Markus
AU - Poeschel, Viola
AU - Held, Gerhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s).
PY - 2023/7/5
Y1 - 2023/7/5
N2 - UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).
AB - UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164420099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000904
DO - 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000904
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85164420099
SN - 2572-9241
VL - 7
SP - E904
JO - HemaSphere
JF - HemaSphere
IS - 7
ER -