Quality assessment of observational studies in psychiatry: An examplefrom perinatal psychiatric research

L. E. Ross, S. Grigoriadis, L. Mamisashvili, G. Koren, M. Steiner, C. L. Dennis, A. Cheung, P. Mousmanis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

In perinatal psychiatry, randomized controlled trials are often not feasible on ethical grounds. Many studies are observational in nature, while others employ large databases not designed primarily for research purposes. Quality assessment of the resulting research is complicated by a lack of standardized tools specifically for this purpose. The aim of this paper is to describe the Systematic Assessment of Quality in Observational Research (SAQOR), a quality assessment tool our team devised for a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evidence-based literature regarding risks and benefits of antidepressant medication during pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-234
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antidepressant medication
  • Depression in pregnancy
  • Quality assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality assessment of observational studies in psychiatry: An examplefrom perinatal psychiatric research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this