TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric analyses of new measures of false-self defense
T2 - Self-relatedness and environment-directedness scales
AU - Eichengreen, Adva
AU - Hoofien, Dan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Hogrefe Publishing
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - The concept of the false-self defense has been widely used in psychoanalytic and psychodynamic literature, both in understanding processes of childhood development and in outlining personality defense mechanisms. This study presents a translation of this theoretical and clinical concept into empirical economical self-report scales assessing Self-Relatedness (16 items) and Environment-Directedness (14 items). The scales' content judgment and psychometric analyses were carried out in three successive studies based on separate samples (N = 226, 208, 176). The scales demonstrate good to excellent internal reliability and are normally distributed in a sample of university students. Results of Study 2 support the scales' convergent, discriminant, and criterion construct validity. Study 3, comparing deaf and hard-of-hearing (d/hoh) students with controls, provides a partial support for the scales' criterion group validity. The findings demonstrate the scales' potential contribution to psychodynamically oriented research, as well as to research enriched by critical sociocultural perspectives.
AB - The concept of the false-self defense has been widely used in psychoanalytic and psychodynamic literature, both in understanding processes of childhood development and in outlining personality defense mechanisms. This study presents a translation of this theoretical and clinical concept into empirical economical self-report scales assessing Self-Relatedness (16 items) and Environment-Directedness (14 items). The scales' content judgment and psychometric analyses were carried out in three successive studies based on separate samples (N = 226, 208, 176). The scales demonstrate good to excellent internal reliability and are normally distributed in a sample of university students. Results of Study 2 support the scales' convergent, discriminant, and criterion construct validity. Study 3, comparing deaf and hard-of-hearing (d/hoh) students with controls, provides a partial support for the scales' criterion group validity. The findings demonstrate the scales' potential contribution to psychodynamically oriented research, as well as to research enriched by critical sociocultural perspectives.
KW - Assessment
KW - False self
KW - Hearing disabilities
KW - Normalization
KW - Psychodynamic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047502923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000399
DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000399
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85047502923
SN - 1015-5759
VL - 35
SP - 379
EP - 391
JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment
IS - 3
ER -