Prenatal multivitamin supplementation and rates of pediatric cancers: A meta-analysis

Y. I. Goh, E. Bollano, T. R. Einarson, G. Koren

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

99 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prenatal supplementation of folic acid has been shown to decrease the risk of several congenital malformations. Several studies have recently suggested a potential protective effect of folic acid on certain pediatric cancers. The protective role of prenatal multivitamins has not been elucidated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential protective effect of prenatal multivitamins on several pediatric cancers. Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Toxline, Healthstar, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published in all languages from 1960 to July 2005 on multivitamin supplementation and pediatric cancers. References from all articles collected were reviewed for additional articles. Two blinded independent reviewers assessed the articles for inclusion and exclusion. Rates of cancers in women supplemented with multivitamins were compared with unsupplemented women using a random effects model. Sixty-one articles were identified in the initial search, of which, seven articles met the inclusion criteria. There was an apparent protective effect for leukemia (odds ratio (OR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.50-0.74), pediatric brain tumors (OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.60-0.88) and neuroblastoma (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.42-0.68). In conclusion, maternal ingestion of prenatal multivitamins is associated with a decreased risk for pediatric brain tumors, neuroblastoma, and leukemia. Presently, it is not known which constituent(s) among the multivitamins confer this protective effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)685-691
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prenatal multivitamin supplementation and rates of pediatric cancers: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this