Predictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant: An automated machine learning model

Marco Seeber, Ilan Alon, David G. Pina, Fredrik Niclas Piro, Michele Seeber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research often fails to be translated into applications because of lack of financial support. The Proof of Concept (PoC) funding scheme from the European Research Council (ERC) supports the early stages of the valorization process of the research conducted by its grantees. This article explores the factors that predict who will apply for ERC grants and which grant proposals will prove successful. By combining information from two datasets of 10,074 ERC grants (representing 8361 individual grantees) and 2186 PoC proposals, and using automated machine learning, we can identify the main predictors of the propensity to apply and to win. Doing so fills a void in the literature on likelihood to apply. The results reveal major differences between potential and actual beneficiaries, due to decisions about applying for a grant and evaluations of the proposals. The decision to apply is affected by the interaction between the characteristics of the PoC funding scheme, the ERC grantee, and his/her environment. Grantees in countries that invest little in innovation, with low cost of personnel, and strong collaboration in innovation are more likely to apply. Male grantees are more likely to apply but have similar chances of winning as women.

Original languageEnglish
Article number122009
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Automated machine learning
  • ERC
  • Likelihood to apply
  • PoC
  • Research funding
  • Research proposals evaluation
  • Research valorization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant: An automated machine learning model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this