TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant
T2 - An automated machine learning model
AU - Seeber, Marco
AU - Alon, Ilan
AU - Pina, David G.
AU - Piro, Fredrik Niclas
AU - Seeber, Michele
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Research often fails to be translated into applications because of lack of financial support. The Proof of Concept (PoC) funding scheme from the European Research Council (ERC) supports the early stages of the valorization process of the research conducted by its grantees. This article explores the factors that predict who will apply for ERC grants and which grant proposals will prove successful. By combining information from two datasets of 10,074 ERC grants (representing 8361 individual grantees) and 2186 PoC proposals, and using automated machine learning, we can identify the main predictors of the propensity to apply and to win. Doing so fills a void in the literature on likelihood to apply. The results reveal major differences between potential and actual beneficiaries, due to decisions about applying for a grant and evaluations of the proposals. The decision to apply is affected by the interaction between the characteristics of the PoC funding scheme, the ERC grantee, and his/her environment. Grantees in countries that invest little in innovation, with low cost of personnel, and strong collaboration in innovation are more likely to apply. Male grantees are more likely to apply but have similar chances of winning as women.
AB - Research often fails to be translated into applications because of lack of financial support. The Proof of Concept (PoC) funding scheme from the European Research Council (ERC) supports the early stages of the valorization process of the research conducted by its grantees. This article explores the factors that predict who will apply for ERC grants and which grant proposals will prove successful. By combining information from two datasets of 10,074 ERC grants (representing 8361 individual grantees) and 2186 PoC proposals, and using automated machine learning, we can identify the main predictors of the propensity to apply and to win. Doing so fills a void in the literature on likelihood to apply. The results reveal major differences between potential and actual beneficiaries, due to decisions about applying for a grant and evaluations of the proposals. The decision to apply is affected by the interaction between the characteristics of the PoC funding scheme, the ERC grantee, and his/her environment. Grantees in countries that invest little in innovation, with low cost of personnel, and strong collaboration in innovation are more likely to apply. Male grantees are more likely to apply but have similar chances of winning as women.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Automated machine learning
KW - ERC
KW - Likelihood to apply
KW - PoC
KW - Research funding
KW - Research proposals evaluation
KW - Research valorization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137262494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122009
DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122009
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85137262494
SN - 0040-1625
VL - 184
JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
M1 - 122009
ER -