TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II study of coumarin and cimetidine in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
AU - Dexeus, Francisco H.
AU - Logothetis, Christopher J.
AU - Sella, Avishay
AU - Fitz, Karen
AU - Amato, Robert
AU - Reuben, James M.
AU - Dozier, Nicki
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Fifty patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) at 100 mg orally daily starting on day 1 and cimetidine 300 mg orally four times a day starting on day 15. When disease progressed, coumarin was escalated to 100 mg orally four times a day. Three patients (6%; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 2% to 17%) achieved a partial response, one of those after dose escalation. In addition, one patient had a minor response, then progressing disease, and again had a minor response after dose escalation. All four responders had nonassessable primary tumors (three had had prior nephrectomy and one a renal angioinfarction). The only major toxicity was renal (37 patients had minor to moderate elevations in serum creatinine level). Immunologic studies (hypersensitivity skin testing, lymphocyte blastogenesis response, number of lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, T helper and T suppressor subsets, and T helper:suppressor ratio), performed before and after therapy, showed a relative lymphopenia and decreased hypersensitivity skin-testing results at baseline, and a general decline over time in the number of T cells and T helper and T suppressor subsets. There was no enhancement in any of the immunologic parameters tested. The response rate was 6%, lower than previously reported; a general immunodeficiency was noted at baseline, and the lymphopenia worsened with progressing disease, unaffected by therapy.
AB - Fifty patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) at 100 mg orally daily starting on day 1 and cimetidine 300 mg orally four times a day starting on day 15. When disease progressed, coumarin was escalated to 100 mg orally four times a day. Three patients (6%; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 2% to 17%) achieved a partial response, one of those after dose escalation. In addition, one patient had a minor response, then progressing disease, and again had a minor response after dose escalation. All four responders had nonassessable primary tumors (three had had prior nephrectomy and one a renal angioinfarction). The only major toxicity was renal (37 patients had minor to moderate elevations in serum creatinine level). Immunologic studies (hypersensitivity skin testing, lymphocyte blastogenesis response, number of lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, T helper and T suppressor subsets, and T helper:suppressor ratio), performed before and after therapy, showed a relative lymphopenia and decreased hypersensitivity skin-testing results at baseline, and a general decline over time in the number of T cells and T helper and T suppressor subsets. There was no enhancement in any of the immunologic parameters tested. The response rate was 6%, lower than previously reported; a general immunodeficiency was noted at baseline, and the lymphopenia worsened with progressing disease, unaffected by therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025173989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 2137163
AN - SCOPUS:0025173989
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 8
SP - 325
EP - 329
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 2
ER -