TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmacoepigenomics in Personalized Medicine
T2 - A Hypothesis-Generating Approach to Introduce CpG-PGx SNPs as New Candidates for a Systematic Insight into Genomic-Epigenomic-Phenomic-Pharmacogenomics (G-E-Ph-PGx) Axis
AU - Sharafshah, Alireza
AU - Blum, Kenneth
AU - Lewandrowski, Kai Uwe
AU - Elman, Igor
AU - Fuehrlein, Brian S.
AU - Baron, David
AU - Pinhasov, Albert
AU - Thanos, Panayotis K.
AU - Fiorelli, Rossano Kepler Alvim
AU - Schmidt, Sergio L.
AU - Gardner, Eliot L.
AU - Lorio, Morgan P.
AU - Lewandrowski, Alexander P.L.
AU - Gold, Mark S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: There are important gaps in describing the associations between variants found by GWAS and various phenotypes. Prior reports suggest that SNPs in regulatory regions should be further investigated to uncover these associations. Thus, this study involved a novel approach, along with Pharmacoepigenomics, prompting a new coined term “CpG-PGx SNP”. Methods: The rationale behind our analysis strategy was based on the impact of SNPs playing dual roles both in the CpG site disruption/formation and having PGx associations. Thus, we employed GeneCards (relevance score), PharmGKB (significant p-value), and GWAS catalog data for each gene (p < 5 × 10−8). Following the obtainment of the 25 best-scored genes of four major epigenetic processes (methylation, demethylation, acetylation, and deacetylation), we generated two lists of candidate genes, including potential CpG-PGx SNPs and possible CpG-PGx SNPs. Results: Among 2900 significant PGx annotations, we found 99 potential CpG-PGx SNPs related to 16 genes. CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and COMT genes were the top genes. Additionally, we found 1230 significant GWAS-based SNPs, among them 329 CpG-SNPs related to 48 genes with at least one CpG site disruption/formation. The top gene with the highest CpG-SNPs was TET2, followed by JMJD1C and HDAC9. Importantly, we detected some synonymous variants in the Epigenetically Modifiable Accessible Region (EMAR), which can provide insights into undiscovered roles of these SNPs. We identified 173 CpG-Disruptive SNPs, 155 CpG-Forming SNPs, and just 1 CpG SNP with both impacts. Conclusions: In conclusion, here we introduce CpG-PGx SNP for the first time and suggest three major genes playing crucial roles in Pharmacoepigenomics (PEpGx), CYP2D6 as the heart of PEpGx, and TET2 with the highest possibility of having CPG-PGx SNPs. We believe that this approach will help the scientific community to utilize “CpG-PGx SNP” to unravel complex disease-driven genetic and epigenetic interactions, yielding therapeutic opportunities.
AB - Background: There are important gaps in describing the associations between variants found by GWAS and various phenotypes. Prior reports suggest that SNPs in regulatory regions should be further investigated to uncover these associations. Thus, this study involved a novel approach, along with Pharmacoepigenomics, prompting a new coined term “CpG-PGx SNP”. Methods: The rationale behind our analysis strategy was based on the impact of SNPs playing dual roles both in the CpG site disruption/formation and having PGx associations. Thus, we employed GeneCards (relevance score), PharmGKB (significant p-value), and GWAS catalog data for each gene (p < 5 × 10−8). Following the obtainment of the 25 best-scored genes of four major epigenetic processes (methylation, demethylation, acetylation, and deacetylation), we generated two lists of candidate genes, including potential CpG-PGx SNPs and possible CpG-PGx SNPs. Results: Among 2900 significant PGx annotations, we found 99 potential CpG-PGx SNPs related to 16 genes. CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and COMT genes were the top genes. Additionally, we found 1230 significant GWAS-based SNPs, among them 329 CpG-SNPs related to 48 genes with at least one CpG site disruption/formation. The top gene with the highest CpG-SNPs was TET2, followed by JMJD1C and HDAC9. Importantly, we detected some synonymous variants in the Epigenetically Modifiable Accessible Region (EMAR), which can provide insights into undiscovered roles of these SNPs. We identified 173 CpG-Disruptive SNPs, 155 CpG-Forming SNPs, and just 1 CpG SNP with both impacts. Conclusions: In conclusion, here we introduce CpG-PGx SNP for the first time and suggest three major genes playing crucial roles in Pharmacoepigenomics (PEpGx), CYP2D6 as the heart of PEpGx, and TET2 with the highest possibility of having CPG-PGx SNPs. We believe that this approach will help the scientific community to utilize “CpG-PGx SNP” to unravel complex disease-driven genetic and epigenetic interactions, yielding therapeutic opportunities.
KW - CpG site
KW - CpG-PGx SNP
KW - CYP2D6
KW - Pharmacoepigenomics
KW - TET2
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025756412
U2 - 10.3390/jpm15120579
DO - 10.3390/jpm15120579
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105025756412
SN - 2075-4426
VL - 15
JO - Journal of Personalized Medicine
JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine
IS - 12
M1 - 579
ER -