Abstract
Previous research indicated that people tend to rate low their ability to tell lies convincingly and at the same time believe that they are better lie detectors than the average person. The present chapter highlights correlations of the low self-assessed lie-telling ability and of the relatively high self-assessed lie-detection ability. A mini metaanalysis was performed on observations gathered from 16 experimental groups. The analysis shows demographic differences in these assessments. It was observed that religiosity, gender, age, and on-the-job lie-related experience, are moderators of the lie-telling and lie-detection ability assessments. Personality dimensions such as the Big Five attributes are also associated with people's lie-related ability assessments. It was further observed that high lie-telling ability raters preferred plausible deception over implausible truth. Finally, larger physiological responses to critical items in the Concealed Information Test were found among high lie-telling ability raters. Suggestions for future research are provided.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Detecting Concealed Information and Deception |
Subtitle of host publication | Recent Developments |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Pages | 353-376 |
Number of pages | 24 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780128127292 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780128127308 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- Age
- Big five
- Concealed information test
- Lie-detection ability
- Lie-telling ability
- Lying preference
- Mini metaanalysis
- Religiosity
- Self-assessments