Peer reviewing as a quality assurance methodology for scientific/ engineering publishing

Miri Priesler, Nira Gruberger, Arie Reichman, Gad Vitner

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

A quality assurance (QA) methodology may support a professional approach for conducting an objective review process of scientific manuscripts to be considered for publication in a scientific journal. In this paper we present the benefits of using QA for Peer Reviewing and we compare the relevancy of the specific criteria and methods of the QA to our fields of research in Engineering and in Mathematics. At last we prove that Peer-Reviewing perhaps may be improved but it certainly can not be Peer-Reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWMSCI 2010 - The 14th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings
Pages30-35
Number of pages6
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event14th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI 2010 - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: 29 Jun 20102 Jul 2010

Publication series

NameWMSCI 2010 - The 14th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings
Volume4

Conference

Conference14th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI 2010
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period29/06/102/07/10

Keywords

  • EE
  • EHF
  • Industry
  • Mathematics
  • Peer Reviewing
  • Quality Assurance
  • Transmitter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peer reviewing as a quality assurance methodology for scientific/ engineering publishing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this