TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-based research in a tertiary pediatric centre
T2 - A pilot study of markers of scientific activity and productivity
AU - Koren, Gideon
AU - Barker, Geoffrey
AU - Mitchell, Victoria
AU - Abramowitch, Leah
AU - Strofolino, Michael
AU - Buchwald, Manuel
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Objective: To characterize patient-based research in a large academic pediatric centre, to examine measures of research activity and productivity among the 44 clinical programs and to examine whether there is a relation among various measures of scientific productivity. Design: Survey. Participants: Clinical programs. Outcome measures: Analysis of all patient-based research projects for the 1993-94 and 1994-95 fiscal years, research funding and cumulative citation impact. Results: Only half of the research projects were funded by extramural grants (peer-reviewed or industrial). There were strong and significant correlations among the 3 markers of scientific activity and productivity: funding, peer-reviewed publications and cumulative citation impact. Only small programs with 3 or fewer faculty members with protected time available to develop research programs achieved a citation impact of 30 or more per full-time equivalent position, with larger programs being 'diluted' by clinicians performing little or no research. Conclusions: In the context of patient-based research, quantity of research correlated with measures of quality. This study highlights the need for clinical departments and medical faculties to consider activity and productivity markers in setting standards for patient-based research.
AB - Objective: To characterize patient-based research in a large academic pediatric centre, to examine measures of research activity and productivity among the 44 clinical programs and to examine whether there is a relation among various measures of scientific productivity. Design: Survey. Participants: Clinical programs. Outcome measures: Analysis of all patient-based research projects for the 1993-94 and 1994-95 fiscal years, research funding and cumulative citation impact. Results: Only half of the research projects were funded by extramural grants (peer-reviewed or industrial). There were strong and significant correlations among the 3 markers of scientific activity and productivity: funding, peer-reviewed publications and cumulative citation impact. Only small programs with 3 or fewer faculty members with protected time available to develop research programs achieved a citation impact of 30 or more per full-time equivalent position, with larger programs being 'diluted' by clinicians performing little or no research. Conclusions: In the context of patient-based research, quantity of research correlated with measures of quality. This study highlights the need for clinical departments and medical faculties to consider activity and productivity markers in setting standards for patient-based research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030782603&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 9336661
AN - SCOPUS:0030782603
SN - 0147-958X
VL - 20
SP - 354
EP - 358
JO - Clinical and Investigative Medicine
JF - Clinical and Investigative Medicine
IS - 5
ER -