On redundancy, efficiency, and robustness in coverage for multiple robots

Noam Hazon, Gal A. Kaminka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

Motivated by potential efficiency and robustness gains, there is growing interest in the use of multiple robots for coverage. In coverage, robots visit every point in a target area, at least once. Previous investigations of multi-robot coverage focus on completeness of the coverage, and on eliminating redundancy, but do not formally address robustness. Moreover, a common assumption is that elimination of redundancy leads to improved efficiency (coverage time). We address robustness and efficiency in a novel family of multi-robot coverage algorithms, based on spanning-tree coverage of approximate cell decomposition of the work-area. We analytically show that the algorithms are robust, in that as long as a single robot is able to move, the coverage will be completed. We also show that non-redundant (non-backtracking) versions of the algorithms have a worst-case coverage time virtually identical to that of a single robot-thus no performance gain is guaranteed in non-redundant coverage. Surprisingly, however, redundant coverage algorithms lead to guaranteed performance which halves the coverage time even in the worst case. We present a polynomial-time redundant coverage algorithm, whose coverage time is optimal, and which is able to address robots heterogeneous in speed and fuel. We compare the performance of all algorithms empirically and show that the use of the optimal algorithm leads to significant improvements in coverage time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1102-1114
Number of pages13
JournalRobotics and Autonomous Systems
Volume56
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coverage
  • Multi-robot systems
  • Path-planning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On redundancy, efficiency, and robustness in coverage for multiple robots'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this