Abstract
An antimagic labeling of an undirected graph G with n vertices and m edges is a bijection from the set of edges of G to the integers {1,...,m} such that all n vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with that vertex. A graph is called antimagic if it admits an antimagic labeling. In (N. Hartsfield and G. Ringel, Pearls in Graph Theory, Academic Press, Boston, 1990, pp. 108-109), Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph, other than K 2, is antimagic. Despite considerable effort in recent years, this conjecture is still open. In this article we study a natural variation; namely, we consider antimagic labelings of directed graphs. In particular, we prove that every directed graph whose underlying undirected graph is "dense" is antimagic, and that almost every undirected d-regular graph admits an orientation which is antimagic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 219-232 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Graph Theory |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Antimagic
- Labeling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On antimagic directed graphs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver