Non-numerical data as data: A positivistic perspective

In this paper, we describe our positive experiences integrating quantitative and qualitative inquiry in sport and exercise psychology. Asked to reflect among other topics, on the weakness and limitations of qualitative methods from a positivist standpoint, we found ourselves first, criticising our own quantitative methods, though questions were also raised in terms of a few qualitative research strategies found in the sport science literature. We conclude by stating that no method is free of limitations and constrains, be it quantitative or qualitative. Rather than researchers accusing one another of conducting weak research, we propose that it is better to look openly and honestly at each other's research and collectively seek ways to enhance our research endeavours, perhaps through a combination of methodological approaches. Further, we would like to see editors and reviewers support mixed designs and respect explorative, interpretative, inductive and deductive methods of inquiry as legitimate when answering questions in the sport and exercise domain, dependent on the research question.