Abstract
Despite bearing increased risk of suffering a heart attack, failure to adhere to a low-fat dietary regimen is wide-spread. The paper applies an expected-utility-maximization model to inquire into the individual's decision to deviate from a prescribed low-fat diet, offering an economic explanation for excess high-fat consumption. The implications of self-protection against the risk of dying from an attack are further examined. The analysis reveals that self-protection and dietary adherence can be complements, suggesting that public health policy may help reduce both the risk of an attack and the risk of dying from an attack through providing incentives for self-protection.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-104 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Hazard rate
- Heart attack
- Low-fat diet
- Non-adherence
- Self-protection
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Non-adherence to a low-fat diet: An economic perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver