Abstract
In this commentary, we raise seven methodological concerns regarding Twenge, Joiner, Rogers, and Martin (2018), among which are inaccurate research measurements, negligible correlations between the main variables, insufficient and inadequate statistical analyses, and problematic interpretation of the results. In fact, the negligible associations between screen activities and depression, their decrease when demographic variables are controlled, and their fading away to nil among boys challenge the article’s title and conclusions, according to which increases in depressive symptoms are attributed to increases in new-media screen use. This conclusion cannot be deduced from the reported results and could be misleading to the general public.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 374-378 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Clinical Psychological Science |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- depression
- moral panic
- social media
- social networking sites
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'New-Media Screen Time Is Not (Necessarily) Linked to Depression: Comments on Twenge, Joiner, Rogers, and Martin (2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver