Abstract
Studies of social power use have frequently employed self-report instruments that are prone to response bias. In the present study, an experimental design was conducted in which 100 participants were asked to gain compliance from in-group and out-group members. We tested whether harsh tactics - often used for elevating self-image at the dyadic level - also provide a means for gaining advantage at the group level. For this purpose, self-esteem and self-efficacy were examined as possible moderators. Findings indicated that self-esteem interacted with target group: Low self-esteem participants used harsh tactics more frequently toward in-group than out-group members; and moderate and high self-esteem participants used harsh tactics more frequently toward out-group than in-group members. The process involved in this interaction is discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3036-3052 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Social Psychology |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Moderators of social power use for in-group/out-group targets: An experimental paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver