TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the substitution of natural materials with industrial byproducts in green roofs using life cycle assessments
AU - Pushkar, Svetlana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - This study conducted life cycle assessments (LCAs)on four types of extensive green roofs and involved replacing natural perlite with the byproducts coal bottom ash (CBA)and fly ash-based aggregates (FAAs)in both the substrate and drainage layers of green roofs. The following combinations were investigated: perlite in both the substrate and drainage layers (PerliteSUB-PerliteDRIN), perlite in the substrate layer and FAAs in the drainage layer (PerliteSUB-FAADRIN), CBA in the substrate layer and perlite in the drainage layer (CBASUB-PerliteDRIN), and CBA in the substrate layer and FAAs in the drainage layer (CBASUB-FAADRIN). Two types of allocation approaches including mass allocation and system expansion were applied to the byproducts. The LCAs encompassed the production stage and the end-of-life stage. A two-stage analysis of variance (ANOVA)was used to analyze the ReCiPe results and the following was confirmed: (i)the analysis identified the best environmentally friendly roof alternative, (ii)it was observed that the results from the simplification of the LCA for the roof (omitting the end-of-life stage)depended on the type of evaluation approach used in the LCA, and (iii)the more comprehensive performance of the LCAs of green roofs was associated with a combination of the ReCiPe and ANOVA methodologies.
AB - This study conducted life cycle assessments (LCAs)on four types of extensive green roofs and involved replacing natural perlite with the byproducts coal bottom ash (CBA)and fly ash-based aggregates (FAAs)in both the substrate and drainage layers of green roofs. The following combinations were investigated: perlite in both the substrate and drainage layers (PerliteSUB-PerliteDRIN), perlite in the substrate layer and FAAs in the drainage layer (PerliteSUB-FAADRIN), CBA in the substrate layer and perlite in the drainage layer (CBASUB-PerliteDRIN), and CBA in the substrate layer and FAAs in the drainage layer (CBASUB-FAADRIN). Two types of allocation approaches including mass allocation and system expansion were applied to the byproducts. The LCAs encompassed the production stage and the end-of-life stage. A two-stage analysis of variance (ANOVA)was used to analyze the ReCiPe results and the following was confirmed: (i)the analysis identified the best environmentally friendly roof alternative, (ii)it was observed that the results from the simplification of the LCA for the roof (omitting the end-of-life stage)depended on the type of evaluation approach used in the LCA, and (iii)the more comprehensive performance of the LCAs of green roofs was associated with a combination of the ReCiPe and ANOVA methodologies.
KW - ANOVA
KW - Allocation approach
KW - Byproduct
KW - Environmental impact
KW - LCA
KW - Natural material replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066030580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.237
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.237
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85066030580
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 227
SP - 652
EP - 661
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -