Management of pain from heel lance with lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream: Is it safe and efficacious in preterm infants?

Bonnie Stevens, Celeste Johnston, Anna Taddio, Anne Jack, Janet Narciso, Robyn Stremler, Gideon Koren, Jacob Aranda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

71 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hospitalized preterm infants undergo multiple painful heel lances. A two-phase, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine 5% cream (EMLA, Astra Pharmaceuticals, L.P., Westborough, MA) for relieving pain from heel lance. One hundred twenty infants were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 g of EMLA or placebo cream for 30 minutes (Phase 1) or 60 minutes (Phase 2) before a routine heel lance. Efficacy was assessed using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Safety was determined by methemoglobin concentration 8 hours after EMLA application and by clinical signs of methemoglobinemia. No significant differences existed on PIPP scores between EMLA and placebo groups in Phase 1 (p < .480) or Phase 2 (p < .831). No infant had any clinical signs of methemoglobinemia. The mean methemoglobin concentration was 1.19% (.47). Approximately 10% of infants had minor skin reactions, and approximately 20% of EMLA-treated infants had blanching at the application site. The authors conclude that EMLA is safe but not efficacious for relieving pain from heel lance in preterm infants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-221
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • EMLA
  • Infants
  • Pain
  • Preterm
  • Procedure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of pain from heel lance with lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream: Is it safe and efficacious in preterm infants?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this