TY - JOUR
T1 - LEED-NC platinum-certified industrial manufacturing space projects in Bangladesh and their environmental assessment
AU - Pushkar, Svetlana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - This study aimed to investigate the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for New Construction (LEED-NC) version 3 (v3) platinum-certified industrial manufacturing space projects in Bangladesh via a life-cycle assessment (LCA). A total of 27 LEED-NC v3 projects were sorted by the energy and atmosphere (EA) “optimize energy performance” credit (EAc1) achievement: 12 projects with the highest EAc1 achievement were collected in Group 1, and 12 projects with the lowest EAc1 achievement were collected in Group 2. Significance tests demonstrated that Group 1 and Group 2 differed based on different achievements in EA, as well as in their materials and resources (MR) credits: namely, EAc1, EAc2 “on-site renewable energy”, and MRc1.1 “building reuse–maintain existing walls, floors, and roof”. Regarding LCA, MRc1.1 was used in the production (P) stage, and EAc1 and EAc2 were used in the operational energy (OE) stage. The ReCiPe2016 endpoint results show that, in the P stage, the Group 2 strategy resulted in the least environmental damage (p = 0.0030), while in the OE stage, the Group 1 strategy resulted in the least environmental damage (p = 0.0130). However, the overall P + OE score showed the same environmental damage, as based on both certification strategies (p = 0.4699). The contribution and novelty of this study lie in its design, which makes it possible to compare at least two LEED certification strategies in the same country, and therefore to select the best alternative among the green building projects in a particular country.
AB - This study aimed to investigate the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for New Construction (LEED-NC) version 3 (v3) platinum-certified industrial manufacturing space projects in Bangladesh via a life-cycle assessment (LCA). A total of 27 LEED-NC v3 projects were sorted by the energy and atmosphere (EA) “optimize energy performance” credit (EAc1) achievement: 12 projects with the highest EAc1 achievement were collected in Group 1, and 12 projects with the lowest EAc1 achievement were collected in Group 2. Significance tests demonstrated that Group 1 and Group 2 differed based on different achievements in EA, as well as in their materials and resources (MR) credits: namely, EAc1, EAc2 “on-site renewable energy”, and MRc1.1 “building reuse–maintain existing walls, floors, and roof”. Regarding LCA, MRc1.1 was used in the production (P) stage, and EAc1 and EAc2 were used in the operational energy (OE) stage. The ReCiPe2016 endpoint results show that, in the P stage, the Group 2 strategy resulted in the least environmental damage (p = 0.0030), while in the OE stage, the Group 1 strategy resulted in the least environmental damage (p = 0.0130). However, the overall P + OE score showed the same environmental damage, as based on both certification strategies (p = 0.4699). The contribution and novelty of this study lie in its design, which makes it possible to compare at least two LEED certification strategies in the same country, and therefore to select the best alternative among the green building projects in a particular country.
KW - Bangladesh
KW - Industrial manufacturing
KW - LEED-NC v3 and v4 platinum-certified projects
KW - Life-cycle assessment
KW - ReCiPe2016 method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175433730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21277
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21277
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85175433730
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 9
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 11
M1 - e21277
ER -