Leed-eb gold projects for office spaces in large buildings transitioning from version 3 (V3) to 4 (v4): Similarities and differences between finland and spain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study aims to assess the similarities and differences between Finland and Spain in terms of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Buildings (LEED-EB) Gold large office building-type projects transitioning from version 3 (v3) to version 4 (v4). The percentages of the average scores are used here to assess the achievements of the LEED-EB data. The natural logarithm of the odds ratio (ln θ) and Fisher′s exact 2 × 2 tests with a mid p-value are used to evaluate dichotomous data, while the exact Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney and Cliff′s δ effect size tests are used to evaluate ordinary data. The results for LEED-EB Gold large offices demonstrate similar certification strategies in Finland and Spain. These results may be useful to LEED-EB practitioners in Finland and Spain for facilitating the selection of appropriate certification strategies in line with identified high-performance credits for large offices.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8737
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Europe
  • LEED-EB v3
  • LEED-EB v4

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leed-eb gold projects for office spaces in large buildings transitioning from version 3 (V3) to 4 (v4): Similarities and differences between finland and spain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this