TY - JOUR
T1 - Iron Bioavailability in Prenatal Multivitamin Supplements with Separated and Combined Iron and Calcium
AU - Ahn, Eric
AU - Kapur, Bhushan
AU - Koren, Gideon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2004 .
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Objective: To compare iron absorption of a prenatal multivita¬min supplement containing both iron and calcium (HICA) to that of another multivitamin containing a lower iron dose and no calcium (LI).Methods: In a crossover study, serum iron was measured in 12 healthy women administered HICA and LI separately on 2 dif¬ferent occasions. Blood samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration of each supplement.Results: The values of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were not significantly different between LI (79.1 ± 36.0 μM*h) and HICA (91.4 ± 50.4 μM*h) (P = .37). After standardizing the AUC for dose, the relative absorption over the 8-hour time period was significantly higher for LI (2.3 ± 1.0 μM*h/mg) than for HICA (1.5 ± 0.8 μM*h/mg) (P = .021).Conclusion: The absorption of iron from a low-iron-containing supplement was similar to that from a supplement with almost twice the amount of iron, due possibly to the exclu¬sion of calcium in the LI product. Thus, while offering similar amounts of iron, the LI supplement may be better tolerated by women who are sensitive to iron-induced adverse effects.
AB - Objective: To compare iron absorption of a prenatal multivita¬min supplement containing both iron and calcium (HICA) to that of another multivitamin containing a lower iron dose and no calcium (LI).Methods: In a crossover study, serum iron was measured in 12 healthy women administered HICA and LI separately on 2 dif¬ferent occasions. Blood samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration of each supplement.Results: The values of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were not significantly different between LI (79.1 ± 36.0 μM*h) and HICA (91.4 ± 50.4 μM*h) (P = .37). After standardizing the AUC for dose, the relative absorption over the 8-hour time period was significantly higher for LI (2.3 ± 1.0 μM*h/mg) than for HICA (1.5 ± 0.8 μM*h/mg) (P = .021).Conclusion: The absorption of iron from a low-iron-containing supplement was similar to that from a supplement with almost twice the amount of iron, due possibly to the exclu¬sion of calcium in the LI product. Thus, while offering similar amounts of iron, the LI supplement may be better tolerated by women who are sensitive to iron-induced adverse effects.
KW - Biological availability
KW - Dietary
KW - Iron
KW - Materna
KW - PregVit
KW - Prenatal care
KW - Supplements
KW - Vitamins
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21644468337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30153-0
DO - 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30153-0
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 15361277
AN - SCOPUS:21644468337
SN - 1701-2163
VL - 26
SP - 809
EP - 813
JO - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
JF - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
IS - 9
ER -