TY - JOUR
T1 - Ipsilateral transfer of motor skill from upper to lower limb in healthy adults
T2 - a randomized controlled trial
AU - Elion, Orit
AU - Kozol, Zvi
AU - Einat, Moshe
AU - Frenkel-Toledo, Silvi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Elion, Kozol, Einat and Frenkel-Toledo.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Intermanual transfer refers to the improvement of motor skill in an untrained contralateral limb following unilateral limb practice. However, it remains uncertain whether motor skill in the lower limb (LL) can improve as a result of practice with the unilateral upper limb (UL). Forty-five healthy participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) UL group, which practiced reaching movement (RM) sequences with the non-dominant left upper limb; or (2) switches observation (SO) group, which observed the same RM sequences; or (3) nature observation (NO) group, which observed nature movies. RM performance with the LL was assessed before, immediately after, and 24 h post-intervention. Response time of RM sequences was faster in the UL group than the NO group in the posttest. Response time improved significantly in the posttest and retest compared to the pretest in all groups, but it improved significantly in the retest compared to the posttest only in the NO group. The percentage of fails to reach within 1 s decreased across all time points in all groups. The combination of practice of the RM sequence with the UL and the cognitive engagement during RM sequence observation contributes to ipsilateral transfer from the UL to the LL.
AB - Intermanual transfer refers to the improvement of motor skill in an untrained contralateral limb following unilateral limb practice. However, it remains uncertain whether motor skill in the lower limb (LL) can improve as a result of practice with the unilateral upper limb (UL). Forty-five healthy participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) UL group, which practiced reaching movement (RM) sequences with the non-dominant left upper limb; or (2) switches observation (SO) group, which observed the same RM sequences; or (3) nature observation (NO) group, which observed nature movies. RM performance with the LL was assessed before, immediately after, and 24 h post-intervention. Response time of RM sequences was faster in the UL group than the NO group in the posttest. Response time improved significantly in the posttest and retest compared to the pretest in all groups, but it improved significantly in the retest compared to the posttest only in the NO group. The percentage of fails to reach within 1 s decreased across all time points in all groups. The combination of practice of the RM sequence with the UL and the cognitive engagement during RM sequence observation contributes to ipsilateral transfer from the UL to the LL.
KW - cognition
KW - ipsilateral transfer
KW - lower limb
KW - motor performance
KW - upper limb
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022088666
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1645986
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1645986
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105022088666
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 19
JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
M1 - 1645986
ER -