Incidence of major malformations in infants following antidepressant exposure in pregnancy: Results of a large prospective cohort study

Adrienne Einarson, Jacquelyn Choi, Thomas R. Einarson, Gideon Koren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

125 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain if antidepressants, as a group, increase the risk for major malformations, as well as assessing each individual antidepressant. Methods: At The Motherisk Program, we analyzed pregnancy outcomes of women (n = 1243) from prospectively collected cases in our database, who were exposed to antidepressants during their pregnancy. We then compared them with a matched comparison group of women (n = 1243) who were not exposed (nonteratogen group). Results: Women (n = 928) who fit the criteria for inclusion, were exposed in the first trimester of pregnancy, and gave birth to a live-born infant were matched to women (n = 928) in the comparison group. There were 30 (3.2%) major malformations in the antidepressant group and 31 (3.3%) in the comparison group (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.61). The antidepressants included in the analysis were: bupropion (113), citalopram (184), escitalopram (21), fluvoxamine (52), nefazodone (49), paroxetine (148), mirtazepine (68), fluoxetine (61), trazodone (17), venlafaxine (154), and sertraline (61). Conclusions: As a group, antidepressant use in the first trimester of pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk for major malformation above the baseline. In addition, no individual antidepressant was associated with an increased risk of a specific malformation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-246
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Psychiatry
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antidepressants
  • Birth defects
  • Congenital malformations
  • Pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence of major malformations in infants following antidepressant exposure in pregnancy: Results of a large prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this