TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrogen adsorption on various transition metal (111) surfaces in water
T2 - a DFT forecast
AU - Karimadom, Basil Raju
AU - Sermiagin, Alina
AU - Meyerstein, Dan
AU - Zidki, Tomer
AU - Mizrahi, Amir
AU - Bar-Ziv, Ronen
AU - Kornweitz, Haya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2024/2/13
Y1 - 2024/2/13
N2 - The hydrogen adsorption and hydrogen evolution at the M(111), (M = Ag, Au Cu, Pt, Pd, Ni & Co) surfaces of various transition metals in aqueous suspensions were studied computationally using the DFT methods. The hydrogens are adsorbed dissociatively on all surfaces except on Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces. The results are validated by reported experimental and computational studies. Hydrogen atoms have large mobility on M(111) surfaces due to the small energy barriers for diffusion on the surface. The hydrogen evolution via the Tafel mechanism is considered at different surface coverage ratios of hydrogen atoms and is used as a descriptor for the hydrogen adsorption capacity on M(111) surfaces. All calculations are performed without considering how the hydrogen atoms are formed on the surface. The hydrogen adsorption energies decrease with the increase in the surface coverage of hydrogen atoms. The surface coverage for the H2 evolution depends on each M(111) surface. Among the considered M(111) surfaces, Au(111) has the least hydrogen adsorption capacity and Ni, Co and Pd have the highest. Furthermore, experiments proving that after the H2 evolution reaction (HER) on Au0-NPs, and Ag0-NPs surfaces some reducing capacity remains on the M0-NPs is presented.
AB - The hydrogen adsorption and hydrogen evolution at the M(111), (M = Ag, Au Cu, Pt, Pd, Ni & Co) surfaces of various transition metals in aqueous suspensions were studied computationally using the DFT methods. The hydrogens are adsorbed dissociatively on all surfaces except on Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces. The results are validated by reported experimental and computational studies. Hydrogen atoms have large mobility on M(111) surfaces due to the small energy barriers for diffusion on the surface. The hydrogen evolution via the Tafel mechanism is considered at different surface coverage ratios of hydrogen atoms and is used as a descriptor for the hydrogen adsorption capacity on M(111) surfaces. All calculations are performed without considering how the hydrogen atoms are formed on the surface. The hydrogen adsorption energies decrease with the increase in the surface coverage of hydrogen atoms. The surface coverage for the H2 evolution depends on each M(111) surface. Among the considered M(111) surfaces, Au(111) has the least hydrogen adsorption capacity and Ni, Co and Pd have the highest. Furthermore, experiments proving that after the H2 evolution reaction (HER) on Au0-NPs, and Ag0-NPs surfaces some reducing capacity remains on the M0-NPs is presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186188225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d3cp05884k
DO - 10.1039/d3cp05884k
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85186188225
SN - 1463-9076
VL - 26
SP - 7647
EP - 7657
JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
IS - 9
ER -