Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Heterogeneous collective criticality in cryptocurrency volatility: Scaling collapse, tail synchronization, and cascade amplification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper tests whether the volatility of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) is better characterized as a heterogeneous collective-critical regime than as asset-by-asset turbulence. Using daily and hourly data, with the daily S&P 500 cash index and the near-continuously-traded EUR/USD reference rate as contrast benchmarks, we extend the Bergmann–Oliveira critical-boundary framework from single-series classification to coupled volatility dynamics. Four results support the claim. First, Ethereum is robustly supercritical and Solana is supercritical under finite-sample validation, whereas Bitcoin is boundary-adjacent, with a point estimate below the boundary but a circular-block interval crossing CR = 1. Second, boundary distance and tail-clustering depth are distinct system-level coordinates: Solana has the largest boundary distance, while Bitcoin exhibits the slowest tail-dependence decay. Third, crypto clustering functions exhibit scaling collapse near a common exponent, β ≈ 0.31, and pairwise and triadic co-exceedances remain above circular-shift, block-shuffle, and factor-residual null envelopes. Fourth, short-horizon volatility-of-volatility preserves cascade amplification, while long smoothing absorbs it; intraday boundary estimates are scale- and estimator-sensitive rather than fixed activation constants. The boundary configuration is not a conditional-heteroskedasticity artifact: heavy tails persist after GARCH/EGARCH/FIGARCH filtering, FIGARCH confirms genuine fractional integration, and a Gaussian-innovation GARCH cannot reproduce the observed supercriticality. The regime is further corroborated by marginal-matched surrogates that isolate the collective component. Conceptually, it recasts a single-series phase boundary as a diagnostic of synchronized collective instability. Practically, crypto tail risk should be monitored through boundary proximity, tail synchronization, and cascade propagation rather than marginal volatility alone.

Original languageEnglish
Article number118809
JournalChaos, Solitons and Fractals
Volume211
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2026

Keywords

  • Critical boundary
  • Cryptocurrency volatility
  • Extreme event clustering
  • Long memory
  • Scaling collapse
  • Self-organized criticality
  • Tail dependence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneous collective criticality in cryptocurrency volatility: Scaling collapse, tail synchronization, and cascade amplification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this