Hebrew Digits in Noise (DIN) Test in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the Hebrew version of the digits-in-noise (DIN) thresholds among cochlear implant (CI) users and their normal-hearing (NH) counterparts, explore the influence of age on these thresholds, examine the effects of early auditory exposure versus its absence on DIN threshold, and assess the correlation between DIN thresholds and other speech perception tests. A total of 13 children with CI (aged 5.5–11 years), 15 pre-lingual CI users (aged 14–30 years), and 15 post-lingual CI users (aged 22–77 years), and their age-matched NH controls (n = 45) participated in the study. Speech perception tasks, including the DIN test, one-syllable word test, and sentence identification tasks in various auditory conditions, served as the main outcome measures. The results indicated that CI users exhibited higher speech reception thresholds in noise across all age groups compared to NH peers, with no significant difference between pre-lingual and post-lingual CI users. Significant differences were also observed in monosyllabic word and sentence accuracy in both quiet and noise conditions between CI and NH groups. Furthermore, correlations were observed between the DIN and other speech perception tests. The study concludes that CI users require a notably higher signal-to-noise ratio to discern digits in noise, underscoring the DIN test’s utility in assessing speech recognition capabilities in CI users while emphasizing the need for a comprehensive test battery to fully gauge their speech perception abilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-468
Number of pages12
JournalAudiology Research
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • cochlear implants
  • digits in noise (DIN)
  • speech perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hebrew Digits in Noise (DIN) Test in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this